Low Code vs No Code: Pros and Cons

Comparison of low-code and no-code platforms: their differences, pros, cons, and suitability for your software development needs

Oct 18, 2024
Low Code vs No Code: Pros and Cons
No-code and low-code platforms are rapidly gaining popularity because they break down the barriers to building software, apps, and websites. Both platforms share the same goal: to make the software development process faster and more affordable.
However, it’s essential to understand the differences between no-code and low-code when deciding between them. While both offer pre-built features to help you get started, factors like scalability, custom features, and hosting options must be considered.
In this article, I'll explain what each term really means, how they differ, and when you should use one over the other. By the end, you'll know which option is best for your specific needs. Let's get started.

What is No-Code?

No-code platforms let you create websites, and apps without writing any code. You use visual tools to drag, drop, and design the elements of your app.
Think of it as a building with Lego blocks. You don’t need to know how the blocks were made; you just snap them together to build something functional. No-code tools like Bubble, Webflow, and Airtable allow you to focus on the design and structure of your app without touching a line of code. They are perfect for small to mid-sized businesses, entrepreneurs, or anyone who needs to create a quick solution for managing workflows or simple apps.
The beauty of no-code is its simplicity. You can launch a project much faster, often within a few days or weeks, compared to months with traditional development, and it's usually cheaper than traditional methods.
However, no-code platforms have limitations. While you can build custom apps, you are restricted to the available features. Many no-code platforms are also platform-dependent, meaning you cannot export your code or host your app outside the no-code platform.
 
Pros
Cons
No technical knowledge is required—ideal for non-developers.
Limited customization and flexibility for complex features.
Rapid development with drag-and-drop tools.
Scalable if built with best practices
Perfect for prototyping and simple to medium-level apps.
Limited control over backend functionality
Cost-effective, especially for small businesses or startups.
Heavily reliant on pre-built templates and components, which may be restrictive.

What is Low-Code?

On the other hand, low-code platforms are designed for people with technical knowledge or coding experience. Unlike no-code, low-code platforms give you more control by allowing you to write code in specific areas when needed. But like no-code, they also provide a visual interface for parts of the app development process.
With low-code tools, you can still use drag-and-drop features, but when a pre-built widget or template doesn’t meet your needs, you can jump into the code and make modifications. This flexibility makes low-code platforms suitable for more complex or enterprise-level applications.
Examples of low-code platforms include Wappler, Mendix, and Zoho Creator. Let’s say you're building an inventory management system for a mid-sized business. Low-code tools allow you to quickly set up the base app using visual elements, but if you need to integrate a custom API or make a complex business rule, you can write code for that specific part.
The downside? While you can get things done faster than traditional coding, you still need some coding knowledge. And because you’re dealing with more complexity, it often takes longer to develop compared to no-code platforms. Low-code platforms are also better suited for larger teams that can handle both the coding and visual design aspects.
 
Pros
Cons
Allows more customization with minimal coding for advanced features.
Some coding knowledge is required for more complex tasks.
Suitable for enterprise-level apps with deeper functionality needs.
Development takes longer compared to no-code.
Better integration with third-party APIs and custom workflows.
Typically more expensive, requiring skilled developers for certain tasks.
Scalable for long-term, enterprise-level projects.
More complex to maintain and manage than no-code platforms.

Key Differences Between Low Code and No Code

While both low-code and no-code platforms aim to speed up the development process, they have clear differences. Here are the key factors to consider:
 
Feature
No-Code Platform
Low-Code Platform
Collaboration
Built-in teamwork tools like real-time editing, version control, and role-based permissions make it ideal for cross-functional team usage (e.g., marketing and HR)
Allows developers and business users to collaborate, combining visual tools with custom code for adaptable, company-wide solutions
Integration Capability
Limited but sufficient, with integration options usually restricted to standard APIs from popular services like Slack and Zapier.
Broad API compatibility, with options for direct SQL queries, REST API integrations, and custom endpoints, useful for complex business processes
Iteration Speed
Minutes to hours for updates, useful for tasks like quick app modifications or adding a new form
Hours to days for more complex updates that require partial custom coding, ideal for detailed workflow changes
Security and Compliance
The platform manages security standards, suitable for general data security but limited in custom control
Allows granular control over security settings, including custom encryption, suitable for enterprise applications requiring compliance with strict standards
Scalability
Scales well for small to medium applications but may encounter limitations with increased complexity or user load if not built using best practices.
Better suited for large applications; supports extensive customization and can handle high user demands in complex systems
Automation
Limited but sufficient automation for workflows, typically using predefined triggers and actions
Extensive automation options with custom scripting, facilitating multi-step, condition-based workflows across systems
Use in Critical Systems
Best for non-critical applications (e.g., SaaS, Marketplaces, project tracking, CRM)
Suitable for critical business applications (e.g., Internal tools, ERP, advanced financial management), often backed by IT for reliability and performance
Popular Platforms
Bubble, Airtable, Webflow, Glide, Adalo, AppSheet
OutSystems, Mendix, Microsoft Power Apps, Appian, Zoho Creator, Retool

When Should You Use No-Code?

No-code platforms are perfect for people who need to build something functional without spending too much time or money. Consider no-code if:
  • Solo entrepreneurs: If you need to create a website or app but don’t have much time or budget, no-code is a great option.
  • Small businesses: If you need simple tools like a booking system, customer relationship management (CRM), or an eCommerce platform, no-code solutions can help you get started quickly.
  • Prototyping: If you have a new idea and want to test it quickly, no-code lets you create a minimum viable product (MVP) in no time before investing in a fully developed version.
For example, if you’re launching an online store, a platform like Webflow can get you up and running quickly. You can easily manage product listings, integrate payment methods, and customize the design without any coding required.
If you need even more flexibility, Bubble is another powerful no-code platform. It lets you build not only MVPs but also fully-featured apps. Bubble offers a range of plugins for extra functionality, allowing you to integrate payment gateways, user authentication, APIs, and more. You can create sophisticated web apps that grow with your business—all without writing a single line of code.

When Should You Use Low-Code?

Low-code platforms are best for projects that need more flexibility and complexity. Consider using low-code if:
  • Additional features: If you need more features than what the platform offers out of the box or want to host your app outside the platform, low-code gives you the control to make those adjustments.
  • Complex business logic: When your app requires advanced workflows or custom business logic that pre-built components can’t handle, low-code lets you add custom scripts to meet those specific needs.
  • Long-term projects: If you’re working on a project that will evolve over time and require ongoing updates or customizations, low-code offers the flexibility to easily make changes as your app grows.
Low-code platforms give you the best of both worlds: faster development times with the freedom to add custom code whenever your project needs it. This makes them ideal for larger, more complex applications that require more than a no-code platform can provide.

Conclusion

In conclusion, both no-code and low-code platforms are designed to accelerate and lower the cost of the software development process, but they cater to different audiences and needs.
No-code is ideal for non-technical users, such as business professionals or designers, who want to build functional apps quickly using a simple drag-and-drop interface without any coding experience.
On the other hand, low-code is better suited for developers or technical users, providing the same design ease but with additional flexibility for handling more complex tasks like backend management and custom integrations.
However, that doesn’t mean no-code is limited to just simple apps. With platforms like Bubble, you can create complex workflows, and advanced logic, and seamlessly integrate third-party plugins for added functionality.
If you have an app idea, Zeroqode is here to help. Our team of expert Bubble developers and designers has built over 500 apps using Bubble. Explore our portfolio to see how we can bring your vision to life!